In MSCRM 4.0 you can specify how the user works with their incoming and outgoing email. Incoming is none, the router, outlook client or the forward mail box while outgoing is the router, outlook client or none. There is two ways to config this, one get the user to set it in their settings (yeah right) or go through the users in the admin side, manually, one by one (boring and a waste of time). Well you can create a simple workflow to do it bulk:

• Step 1: Create a new blank workflow and set the entity to system user (despite my picture). http://www.sadev.co.za/files/user1.png 
• Step 2: Turn off the automatic options (well maybe, you may want this to run on create so future users also are set right). Click "On Demand" under available to run. Add a step to update the user. http://www.sadev.co.za/files/user2.png 
• Step 3: Click the set properties and update the "Email Access Configuration" to your preferred method. http://www.sadev.co.za/files/user3.png
• Step 4: Save your work flow and now click the "Run Workflow" button on the user list and select your workflow and click OK. http://www.sadev.co.za/files/user4.png

And voila now you have the users updated to the correct method. Another nice option for the network admins is once you installed the email router the ad users and groups has a menu option to launch the config tool for them (see http://www.sadev.co.za/files/ad.png)

When configuring the MSCRM 4.0 email router for Exchange incoming you may get the following message when testing: Incoming Status: Failure - The remote server returned an error: (403) Forbidden.

This is actually caused by a bad UI (IMHO) which kinda gets you to configure it wrong. What has happened is that the outgoing has a tick box saying to use SSL and asks for a server name, while the incoming asks for a URL. It automatically puts in http:// so naturally you fill in your server, i.e. http://myexchange

However Exchange runs on SSL so it actually needs to be https://myexchange

If that doesn't help then open up the URL you are putting in, in a web browser and see if it works. You'll get a lot more information on the real cause.

In MSCRM 3.0 I did a few redeployments of MSCRM and what was nice was in the database was the license table which contained the key. This was great since most of the time the customer couldn't find the original media a year down the line.

Well for MSCRM 4.0 the license table is gone, but fear not you can still get the key. If you have the media the key is in a file called license.txt (atleast according to the implementation guide). If you got the download version there is no such file but you can still get it from the MSCRM_CONFIG database in the ConfigSettings table.

Static analysis is the process of having a tool scan at your compiled and/or uncompiled code for things like bad practises, maintainabilty, performance and security issues and so on. If you have Visual Studio Team Edition or better then you have the built in tool which is based on the free FxCop. Wikipedia contains a nice list of various tools available, but the reason why FxCop/VS is so much better is the help on the issues. All the help contains samples and information on the how and why of the problem and solutions for it. This actually becomes more than a tool to ship software but a great learning aid for the developer using it.

There is an interesting site called spock which you put your name in and it finds details about you. Seems very poor results for anyone beside the brits and the yanks (aka the rest of the world!) but once I put in South Africa it did find one thing about me.

Long running comment with people I know is the one "There is blood in my alcohol stream" (sometimes changed to "There is blood in my coffee stream"). Anyway someone finally proved it is possible, albeit that it is scary that it was only found out because she was driving at the time (or passing out while driving). More on her at http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2004094566_webdui27m.html (via http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2008/01/02/6950841.aspx).

Subjects in MSCRM are this interesting tree view structure which allows you to associate cases, kb articles and products in interesting ways. However they have never been customizable, which has limited the usefulness of them, in addition to a few interesting limitations they had. Well MSCRM 4.0 takes two steps forward into making subjects useful, namely:

• You can now delete used subjects. In MSCRM 3.0 once you used a subject it was locked and could never be deleted, even if you updated all your cases etc... to another one. This made management of the tree a nightmare since it basically meant that you got one chance. In MSCRM 4.0, provided nothing is currently associated to the subject, you can delete it. If you try and delete one and it is associated you'll get an error message, simply fire up advanced find and remove/update the linked items and you will be able to delete the subject!
• You can now associate subjects to other entities! But not with the full MSCRM 4.0 power. In fact the only thing is a one to many (1:N) relationship (see attached screen shot), many to one (N:1) and many to many (N:N) are not available. This means that your custom entities or system entities can now use the main subject tree too!

It's still not where it needs to be, namely support for multiple subject trees, customization support (even just adding attributes would help) and better display showing the full structures (ala X > Y > Z) but it is now much more usable than before.

UT3 is pretty (not Crysis pretty, but pretty enough), but the gameplay rocks and replayablity is high. The problem is to get it smooth enough for competitive gaming you need to tweak those INI files, well thankfully someone has built a tool to do it: UT 3 Tweaker

So I have a problem, just a small one, when I go to any Passport/Live site and sign in, it fails. Only the first time, second time always in. Nothing serious I can work, but I thought maybe I should log this with Microsoft and maybe they can fix it? Since it is happening across multiple machines I am sure it's an account issue.

So off I log the call with all kinds of info (including I use Vista solely now on my work and home machines) and go though a few simple check emails. Annoyingly I get a new person on each email. Maybe I am spoilt from partner based support where the same person responds and they know whats going on, but getting a new person who is obviously not checking what has been done before and simply sending crap is getting too much. The last email broke the camels back. Why?

THEY TOLD ME TO UNINSTALL IE7! I mean for fucks sake, it's been out for year and is a flag ship product for Microsoft and support thinks it's the cause!?!? Worst is (and bonus points for you if you picked this up) Vista ships with it, there is no uninstall back to IE 6!?!I've attached a screenshot of the email in case you think I am crazy.

 

In my previous post I spoke about some of the new features in 3.5. For ASP.NET though there is more goodness coming in the form of the ASP.NET 3.5 Extensions package. This package contains some interesting bits I want to highlight.

• ASP.NET MVC: This model view controller (MVC) framework for ASP.NET provides a structured model that enables a clear separation of concerns within web applications, and makes it easier to unit test your code and support a TDD workflow. It also helps provide more control over the URLs you publish in your applications, and more control over the HTML that is emitted from them.
• ASP.NET Silverlight Support: With the ASP.NET 3.5 Extensions release we'll deliver support for easily integrating Silverlight within your ASP.NET applications.  Included will be new controls that make it easy to integrate Silverlight video/media and interactive content within your sites.
• ADO.NET Data Service (codename "Astoria"): In parallel with the ASP.NET Extensions release we will also be releasing the ADO.NET Entity Framework.  This provides a modeling framework that enables developers to define a conceptual model of a database schema that closely aligns to a real world view of the information.  We will also be shipping a new set of data services (codename "Astoria") that make it easy to expose REST based API endpoints from within your ASP.NET applications.

There are a few more and Scott Guthries post will be good to cover if you are interested (all the info above is from him).

Now starting with Silverlight support thats a no brainer really. If your market is developers wanting great tools, then making them edit HTML to get your new platform is a little tougher than need be. The MVC is a nice thing if you believe the information on it (I haven't used it yet myself) but it basically is bringing a lot of the CCF/CAB ideas to the web in a elegant way. Lastly Astoria is a great technology (I almost built my own for a project but beta 1 came out and saved me from that) which gets your data from within the black box of servers on to the web in a way it can be consumed by client applications easily. Obviously performance doesn't compare to ADO.NET directly but if you don't have access to the server this is the way to share information.